Vai al contenuto

Is the multi-manager hedge-fund boom coming to an end?

Multi-manager funds have transformed the hedge-fund industry, generating impressive performance and substantially growing their market share. Underwhelming returns and concerns about high charges sparked outflows in 2024, but investor interest is likely to pick up along with returns.

Simulated trading indices on a monitor screen Source: Getty Images

Multi-manager hedge funds, which operate multiple trading teams or ‘pods’ that execute diverse strategies across various markets, have pulled in tens of billions of dollars in recent years, thanks to strict risk controls and consistent returns, even in equity bear markets such as that seen in 2022. However, in the 12 months to the end of June 2024, more than $30 billion in client withdrawals were made, marking a sudden shift in sentiment for one of the industry’s most sought-after strategies, according to a report by Goldman Sachs cited by the Financial Times.1

The outflows seen in 2024 were the first in seven years, reflecting weak returns in 2023. While larger firms such as Citadel and Millennium outperformed, smaller players struggled. Balyasny Asset Management and Schonfeld Strategic Advisors posted gains of just 2.7% and 3% respectively, barely exceeding the risk-free rate, according to a report by Hedgeweek.2

Increasing charges in the sector may also be deterring interest. Multi-manager hedge funds charge expense fees about triple the size of traditional peers, according to a Barclays note to clients reported by Reuters.3 While a traditional hedge fund has a fixed 2% cost fee and the owners of the fund take 20% of profits after costs, the multi-manager platform must pay bonuses to the traders working at the fund and therefore charge higher expense fees, according to Reuters. Consequently, rather than the so-called 2-and-20 charge, the multi-manager fund is more like 7-and-20.4

Goldman Sachs data from a survey of more than 300 investors, such as family offices, sovereign wealth funds and pension schemes, showed that just 15% expressed an interest in increasing their exposure to multi-manager strategies with so-called pass-through fees, where the hedge fund passes on its costs. The figure had declined from just over a fifth of investors willing to take on the extra fees the same time a year earlier, said Goldman Sachs.5

However, the appeal of multi-manager hedge funds may rebound if performance improves and their long-term record is good. For the 10 years ending 31 March 2024, a Multi-Manager Peer Group Composite, comprising 34 members, had an average annual return of 7.38%, versus 4.93% for traditional hedge funds, with about half the volatility, according to a study by Morgan Stanley.6

Multi-manager hedge funds have various advantages over single hedge funds, which “tend to carry net exposures and trading betas associated with their particular strategy” and “more often they are amplified forms of the manager’s investment views, leading to highly correlated ideas and holdings”, according to Morgan Stanley.

By contrast, a multi-manager platform offers “a range of diversified alpha sources and centralizes the risk management function” and the independent managers “are thus free to put their talents to their highest and best use”, Morgan Stanley adds.

Multi-Manager Platforms Have Delivered Stronger Risk-Adjusted Returns Than Hedge Funds

Table showing average annualzed returns average multi-PM hedge funds versus HFRI fund weighted composite index Source: MSIM Hedge Funds
Table showing average annualzed returns average multi-PM hedge funds versus HFRI fund weighted composite index Source: MSIM Hedge Funds


Goldman Sachs believes that the pace of multi-manager growth and fierce competition in the sector present headwinds and return dispersion will be high. It adds that single-manager hedge funds have fought back against the competition from multi-managers by borrowing from the latter’s successful practices. However, Goldman Sachs argues that the best multi-manager funds – those that remain prudently capitalised and have a strong level of talent that aligns with the organisation’s strengths and infrastructure – can continue to be very successful.

Sources

1 https://www.ft.com/content/6b419f5c-9e1d-422a-ae71-638c265f85ba
2 https://www.hedgeweek.com/multi-manager-hedge-funds-see-outflows-as-investor-interest-wanes-says-goldman/
3 https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/multi-manager-hedge-funds-offer-big-returns-high-cost-2023-02-08/
4 https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/multi-manager-hedge-funds-offer-big-returns-high-cost-2023-02-08/
5 https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/hedge-fund-investor-appetite-hit-by-high-fees-private-credit-says-goldman-sachs-2024-08-02/
6 https://www.morganstanley.com/im/en-us/individual-investor/insights/articles/how-multi-manager-platforms-find-strength-in-numbers.html#:~:text=For%20the%2010%20years%20ended,volatility%20(See%20Display%202).

Data di pubblicazione: 2024-12-19T13:02:02+0000

This information has been prepared by IG, a trading name of IG Markets Limited. In addition to the disclaimer below, the material on this page does not contain a record of our trading prices, or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instrument. IG accepts no responsibility for any use that may be made of these comments and for any consequences that result. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk. Any research provided does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any specific person who may receive it. It has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such is considered to be a marketing communication. Although we are not specifically constrained from dealing ahead of our recommendations we do not seek to take advantage of them before they are provided to our clients. See full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

All trading involves risk to capital.

Contact us

Let us create a solution tailored for your needs. Get in touch with our team by phone or email to discuss your objectives, or request a brochure.

For more info on how we might use your data, see our privacy notice and access policy and privacy website.