The Political Impact
Robert Kelly
Professor of Political Science and Diplomacy, Pusan National University
Even if the Qatar world cup is moved to another country, the Gulf states aren’t going to change a lucrative system because of some passing negative Western attention on CNN. The Gulf is corrupt and has a long, inglorious record of exploiting foreign labour. That much of this labour is also Muslim limits its visibility and the moral outrage that comes from abuse, but it is well known. North Koreans, Filipinos, and Africans have been found in these places too. So there would be some brief negative western press attention, but nothing near what would be required to push the country to change. International sports and cultural events are prestige-seeking ventures in these countries. They exist to create the veneer of modernisation and attract positive attention, but they are not actually relevant for the economy. If the government has to dispense with them, it is not costly enough to bring real local political change.
Joshua Mahony
Market Analyst, IG
Relationships between the Qatari royals/leadership and the likes of the UK government would likely be strained, given that much of the initial FIFA corruption inquiry was triggered, in part, by a British newspaper investigation.
John Phelan
Economist, Center of the American Experiment
The effect would be small, I think. While this might add to resentment towards the West in the Middle East, it would be pretty small in terms of other past and present provocations.
The Economic Impact
Robert Kelly
Professor of Political Science and Diplomacy, Pusan National University
Gulf cultural events like racing or golf are prestige-seeking affairs with little real impact on the region’s economies.
Joshua Mahony
Market Analyst, IG
There would be a boost to the new host nation, with tourism, retail sales, hospitality and alcohol sales rising significantly. High street firms would gain the most, given the increased footfall, while hotels, bars and restaurants would also enjoy better business.
John Phelan
Economist, Center of the American Experiment
I think there would be little economic impact. The world cup is not an economic driver for Qatar, it could lose it and not be greatly put out, financially. There would be some effect for wherever the tournament moves to, but as it would likely be a rich country like England, Germany, or Italy, it would be pretty small in terms of the overall economy.
Russia, which is hosting the 2018 world cup, has seen spiralling costs. Its own government documents show the country has spent $11.8 billion on the football tournament, which takes place in June and July. While many countries which host the world cup consider the spending an investment into decades worth of infrastructure, it is very common for stadiums to not be used after the competition. One stadium in Brazil, Arena Pernambuco in Recife, can now be hired out for birthday parties.
The Financial Impact
Robert Kelly
Professor of Political Science and Diplomacy, Pusan National University
There would perhaps be a bit of capital flight out of the Gulf for a few months, but nothing serious.
John Phelan
Economist, Center of the American Experiment
I wouldn’t imagine there would be much of an effect at all. Qatar is using the tournament to showcase its wealth, not to drive growth or redevelopment, as the UK did with the 2012 Olympics in east London.
Data shows that world cups have a couple of small but interesting effects on stock markets. In fact, during the 2010 world cup in South Africa, the number of trades made when the national team was playing fell by 45%, according to an European Central Bank study of 15 international stock exchanges. Every time a goal was scored, there was a further 5% drop in trading. The world cup-winning country is also likely to see its stock market rise, with a Goldman Sachs study finding that previous winners got a bump of 3.5% over the following month.
The Social Impact
Robert Kelly
Professor of Political Science and Diplomacy, Pusan National University
It would be a blow for foreign labour all over the world and might encourage better treatment of populations such as itinerant labour from North Korea or the Philippines. NGOs would use this a major case in their activism.
Joshua Mahony
Market Analyst, IG
There would be a greater feeling of persecution from the traditional European/US powers against Middle Eastern nations.
John Phelan
I think you would have anger across the Middle East. It would be seen as westerners imposing their standards on them, again. It wouldn’t have the impact that the Iraq War or Muhammad cartoons had, but there would be some effect and it would reinforce a narrative.
The Social Impact